We have a client planning to build a gantry handling system using a ctrlX XCD dual-axis drive. The specific configuration is as follows:

Drive: 1 * XCD2-W2323ARN-02AETM5ECNN-S06RSN4TX1N3NN

Motor/Encoder: 2 * third-party linear motor with Renishaw sine/cosine encoder

However，Section 7.1 of document "R911420702_02" contains a description regarding the encoder, as follows:

Therefore, I would like to know whether incremental encoders—such as sine-cosine encoders—are suitable for use in gantry handling systems？

I would like to create a mutually exclusive button group consisting of two or more buttons in a WebIQ screen. When any button in this group is selected, all other buttons should automatically become inactive, so that only the last selected button remains active.

In addition, the active button must be clearly visually distinguishable; the active button’s border should turn green, while inactive buttons should retain their default appearance.

How can I implement this behavior without using radio buttons?

Thanks,

I suspect in some cases some parameters of the hardware have to be configured so that the speed/positioning control of the motor works properly: Can this then be done directly via the MOTION app via the webinterface of the ctrlX CORE? Or are additional programs necessary to install outside of the ctrlX CORE?

If yes, I as a enduser and programmer of the machine would love to see that everything regarding the software and hardware configuration could be done directly with the apps in the ctrlX CORE webinterface, so that no additional PC and separate software is needed to install which would make the comissioning much easier. (at least if you just want to make a motor spin)

We are wondering if Bosch Rexroth offers a touch guard for the higher current XNF filters (XNF...150, XNF...240) for protection.

If not, do we have recommendations on covering the lugs?

Thank you!

We are considering using the Rexroth Smart Function Kit for Pressing in a new project. However, we would like to use the system for a pulling operation.

As an example, from start position, we'll apply a pulling force of XXX N in the reverse direction, and check that the displacement does not exceed X mm, or we'll move X mm in reverse and check the force if its in required window.

I would like to know if this is supported by the Smart Function Kit for Pressing.

Is it possible to use a function such as “Join to force” with a target position behind the current position? Can the system apply and control force while moving in the negative direction?

Or would another function or method be more suitable for this kind of pulling application?

Thank you for your support.

I am running into a persistent performance issue with my setup and could really use some fresh eyes or advice.

My Setup:

• PLC: Sigmatek PLC

• Data Destination: InfluxDB running on a ctrlX CORE X3

• Method: Sending data via HTTP POST requests directly from the PLC to InfluxDB.

The Problem:

Everything works perfectly fine at startup. However, as time goes on, the HTTP POST requests become progressively slower. Eventually, the latency increases so much that the required cycle times/intervals can no longer be met.

What I’ve Investigated So Far:

• PLC Side: Naturally, my first thought was a bottleneck or resource leak on the PLC side. I have done a lot of troubleshooting myself, and I've also been in close contact with Sigmatek Support.

• The Test: The support team recreated my exact PLC setup in their office, sending HTTP POST requests to their own test data server. In their environment, the system runs flawlessly without any accumulated time delay.

Because the PLC seems to perform fine when targeting a different server, the issue strongly points toward the server side—specifically, InfluxDB running on the ctrlX CORE X3.

My Question:

Has anyone experienced similar degradation in HTTP POST performance with InfluxDB on a ctrlX CORE? Could this be related to resource allocation, writing/indexing bottlenecks in InfluxDB over time, or a specific configuration issue on the ctrlX?

Any tips, tweaks, or troubleshooting ideas are highly appreciated. Everything helps!

Thanks in advance!

Is it possible to connect C15 to standard Profinet only (without Profisafe) for exchange of non-safe signals?

I have seen the post at Connecting to CtrlX Safe CX15 via IP Channel from XM but wasn't clear to me if it would work without Profisafe Master?

Many Thanks

I have the understanding that on ctrlX X3, and X3 Plus, the XF50 port can be configured either as an EtherCAT master port or as a standard Ethernet TCP/IP port, depending on whether the EtherCAT master app is installed or not.

However, I have a question regarding its behavior when used as a standard Ethernet TCP/IP port. In this case, does it provide the same performance as the XF10 and XF51 Ethernet interfaces?